The anecdote in the bible raises plenty of questions as it is:
Ok, fair enough. But a little later on, we read a completely different version of the same story. In Judges 1, we read how the Israelites first conquer half of Canaan, including Jerusalem, before some of them turned to Hormah:
According to bible scholars, this is a clear indication that the bible combines several different Canaanite conquest stories. And obviously, you shouldn’t take them too literally.
Archaeology supports that. Archaeologists have identified and examined several ancient ruins that must have been Arad and Hormah, the two cities mentioned in the bible. Researchers aren’t exactly sure which is which.
But one thing is certain: none of the places was inhabited at the 13th century, the time when the Israelites are believed to have crossed the desert. |
||
‘Hormah’ translates as ‘broken rock’ or ‘destroyed place’. This strongly suggests that the place was destroyed in prehistoric times and that the bible sought to give an explanation for its destruction. In Joshua, there are plenty more examples like these: the most famous ones are Jericho and Ai, places that were already in ruins as long as people could remember. The bible's answer: that's because Joshua did it! But archaeologists know that this isn't true. The cities had already been destroyed much earlier. Finkelstein and Silberman: "The bible unearthed" (2003) William Stiebing: "Out of the desert? Archaeology and the exodus" (1989) |
||